|
|
|
PRESS RELEASE (Brussels, December 11, 2007) – Today the European Parliament adopted an inadequate compromise agreement on the new Air Quality Directive, which was reached between representatives of the European Parliament and EU governments. EEB[1] sees the result as a messy legislative text providing little clear guidance to national and local authorities for cleaning the air in our cities. John Hontelez, EEB’s Secretary-General, said, "Initially, this Directive was proposed to simplify existing air quality laws. It is ironic and sad that it now contains three different kinds of new exemptions, including how and when limit values for harmful particulate matter apply and what counts as pollution. This is not better regulation – it is more confusing regulation. It would have been better if the four old Directives addressing air quality were implemented correctly and on time.” EEB is particularly disappointed with the adopted standards related to the fine dust particles which are particularly harmful to peoples’ health. The main limit value now set at 25 micrograms per cubic meter [2] will enter into force in 2015. This will not lead to a meaningful reduction of pollution as such concentration level is likely to be met anyway without any extra effort from Member States. “Politicians have allowed the weakening of existing laws in order to get two new limit values for fine particles,” said Doreen Fedrigo, EEB’s EU Policy Unit Coordinator. “This might seem attractive at first, but in fact, it will not demand the required additional action that would improve air quality.” Nonetheless, EEB is pleased to see that the Council did not give in to pressure to further delay deadlines for meeting existing standards for bigger particles (PM10). Meeting the limit values for PM10 may now be postponed from the original deadline of 2005 until 2011, while Parliament had asked for even longer postponement periods. “Action on particulate matter cannot wait,” insists Dragomira Raeva, EEB’s air quality policy officer. “Luckily decision-makers did not relent to the excessive demands from Parliament regarding time extensions. Yet, even with 3 years, there is a risk that these extensions are a blank cheque for polluters.” Notes for editors [2] Fine particles are also referred to as PM2.5. For PM2.5 three new standards have been proposed:
The World Health Organization has recommended PM2.5 concentration levels of 10µg/m3. For further information please contact:-
|